Inverse solution of groundwater models - Indirect approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Shahid Beheshti University - Faculty of Civil, Water and Environment

2 Assistant professor, Faculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is developing a framework for the calibration of groundwater models. The automatic calibration with indirect approach has been considered. Inverse problem in groundwater flow modeling is defined as an optimization problem. For solving the nonlinear optimization problem, genetic algorithm has been used. Minimization the root of mean square deviation between observed and the corresponding computed heads in MODFLOW is considered as a calibration and evaluation criterion. Also, the hydraulic conductivity and specific yield (with known zonation) have been considered as the model parameters. Changing some part of MODFLOW-2005 source codes and embedding the genetic algorithm, an optimization program (MF2005GA_P) has been developed in FORTRAN 90. Internal exchange of main variables (e.g. RMSE) in this program obviously decreases execution time comparing to the approach of linking optimization and simulation codes. The program has been developed and primarily is evaluated based on a hypothetical model. Next, Abhar aquifer is selected as a case study and the program performance in a real scale has been investigated. This method results have shown about 40 percent decrease in RMSE compared with trial and error calibration results.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abkhan Consulting Engineers (2003) Project of conjunctive use of Abhar plain water resources, vol. 9: Groundwater simulation model, Tehran, 72p (In Persian)
Ahmadi A (2015) Inverse solution for groundwater models using meta-heuristic algorithms, MSc. Thesis, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran (In Persian)
Alimohammadi S, Hosseinzadeh H (2010) Conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater resources in Abhar river basin. Journal of Water and Wastewater 21(3):75-87 (In Persian)
Anderson MP, Woessner WW (1992) Applied groundwater modeling: Simulation of flow and advective transport. Academic Press, New York, 381p
Delleur JW (2007) The Handbook of Groundwater Engineering, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, New York, Chapter 23:816-867
Dréo J, Candan C (2011) Metaheurisrics (access date: Sep. 10, 2014) <http://www.wikipedia.com/ metaheuristics/>
Goldberg DE (2006) Genetic Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, New York, 412p
Harbaugh AW (2005) MODFLOW-2005, the US Geological Survey modular ground-water model—The ground-water flow process: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-A16. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, 253p
Harbaugh AW, Hill MC (2013) Observations in MODFLOW-2005. USGS 9-21-2009, 32p
Haupt RL, Haupt SE (2004) Practical Genetic Algorithms. Wiley, New York, 253p
Hill MC, Tiedeman CR (2007) Effective groundwater model calibration: with analysis of data, sensitivities, predictions, and uncertainty. Wiley, New York, 455p
Ataie-Ashtiani B, Rajabi MM, Ketabchi H (2013) Inverse modelling for freshwater lens in small islands: Kish Island, Persian Gulf. Journal of Hydrogeological Processes 27(19): 2759-2773
Ketabchi H, Ataie-Ashtiani B (2015a) Evolutionary algorithms for the optimal management of coastal groundwater: A comparative study toward future challenges, Journal of Hydrology 520:193-213
Ketabchi H, Ataie-Ashtiani B (2015b) Review: Coastal groundwater optimization - advances, challenges, and practical solutions. Hydrogeology Journal 23:1129-1154
Ketabchi H, Ataie-Ashtiani B (2015c) Assessment of a parallel evolutionary optimization approach for efficient management of coastal aquifers. Journal of Environmental Modelling and Software 74:21-38
Kresic N. (1997) Hydrogeology and Groundwater Modeling. Taylor and Francis, London, 461p
Lingireddy S (1998) Aquifer parameter estimation using genetic algorithms and neural networks. Journal of Civil Engineering Systems15(2):125-144
Madsen KM, Perry AE (2010) Using genetic algorithms on groundwater modeling problems in a consulting setting. In: Proc. of Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, Water and Energy, Oct., USA. 15(1):103-114
McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (2003) The History of MODFLOW. Journal of Ground Water 41(2):280-283
Nicklow J, Reed P, Savic D, Dessalegne T, Harrell L, Chan-Hilton A, Karamouz M, Minsker B, Ostfeld A, Singh A, Zechman E (2010) State of the art for genetic algorithms and beyond in water resources planning and management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 136(4):412-432
Office of Groundwater (OGW), USGS (2011) Status of MODFLOW Versions and MODFLOW-related programs. 3p (access date: Nov. 5, 2014) <http://water.usgs.gov/nrp/gwsoftware/modflow-status/>
Poeter EP, Hill MC (1997) Inverse models: A necessary next step in ground-water modeling. Journal of Groundwater 35(2):250-260
Solomatine DP, Dibike YB, Kukuric N (1999) Automatic calibration of groundwater models using global optimization techniques. Journal of Hydrological Sciences 44(6):879-894
Sun NZ (1999) Inverse problem in groundwater modeling. Springer, New York, 337p
Wang M, Zheng, C (1996) Aquifer parameter estimation under transient and steady-state conditions using genetic algorithms. In: Proc. of ModelCARE 96 Conference, Colorado, Sep., IAHS Publications-Series and Reports, Hydrological Sciences 237:21-30
Yeh WWG (1986) Review of parameter identification procedures in groundwater hydrology: The inverse problem. Journal of Water Resources Research 22(2):95-108
Zahraie B, Hosseini S.M (2009) Genetic algorithm and engineering optimization, Gutenberg, Tehran, 260p (In Persian)
Zheng C. (1997) ModGA: Documentation and user's guide, Using Genetic Algorithms for parameter estimation. Technical Report to DuPont Company, Hydrogeology Group, University of Alabama, 6p (access date: Mar. 15, 2014) <http://hydro. geo.ua.edu/zheng/>