Iran-Water Resources Research

Iran-Water Resources Research

Challenges to Farmers’ Participation in Water Resources Policy-Making in Iran; A Policy Cycle Analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Student in Water Resources Engineering, Department of Hydrology andcWater Resources, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, ShahidcChamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
2 * Professor, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract
This study aims to identify the position and barriers to farmers’ participation and their related organizations in the management of water resources in Iran. The research adopts a qualitative content analysis approach. The study population includes 13 official documents, laws, regulations, and national programs, approved by Iran’s policymaking institutions that directly address farmers’ participation in water resources management. These documents cover the period from 1989 to 2024. The theoretical framework of the study is the policy cycle model, which analyzes the policymaking process in four stages: problem identification, formulation, implementation, and evaluation. The findings reveal that although national laws and policies have repeatedly emphasized the necessity of farmers’ participation and the establishment of their organizations, such participation has been primarily defined as a means to achieve broader economic and technical objectives rather than as an independent and fundamental goal. The neglect of stakeholder participation principles in the problem identification stage, contradictions and inconsistencies among laws, centralization of authority, and limited delegation of power to farmers’ organizations during the formulation and implementation stages have created a disconnect between farmers and policymakers. Moreover, the absence of clear and structured programs, lack of stable financial resources, and weakness in independent monitoring and evaluation mechanisms have been among the major challenges to achieving effective participation. Overall, these factors have led to the failure and discontinuity of the policy cycle and to a top-down, one-dimensional policymaking process in water resource management, reducing farmers’ participation to a merely symbolic level.
Keywords

Alfredo K, Montalto F, Bartrand T, Wolde-Georgis T, and Lall U (2016) Using a participatory stakeholder process to plan water development in Koraro, Ethiopia. Water 8(7):275
Alvani S and Sharifzadeh F (2011) The public policymaking process. Allame Tabatabei University Press (In Persian)
Anderson JE (2014) Public policymaking: An introduction. Cengage Learning, 1-34p
Ansell C, Sørensen E, and Torfing J (2017) Improving policy implementation through collaborative policymaking. Policy & Politics 45(3):467-486
Ashtarian K (2023) Handbook of government planning and public policy. Mizan, 34p (In Persian)
Attar S and KhajeNaieni A (2015) The analysis of affecting factors in inefficiency of Iran’s policy making system. Iranian Journal of Public Policy 1(1):1-20 (In Persian)
Bakker K (2003) From public to private to… mutual? Restructuring water supply governance in England and Wales. Geoforum 34(3):359–374
Bayat-Afshary N, Danesh-Yazdi M, and Shakeri F (2025) Machine learning projections of Iran’s water scarcity response to climate-land use synergies. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 61:102638
Brooks S (1998) Public policy in Canada: An introduction. Oxford University Press, 78p
Brugge R, Rotmans J, and Loorbach D (2005) The transition in Dutch water management. Regional Environmental Change 5:164–176
Capano G and Howlett M (2020) The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. SAGE Open 10(1)
Chu Z, Bian C, and Yang J (2022) How can public participation improve environmental governance in China? A policy simulation approach with multi-player evolutionary game. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 95:106782
Ding L, Ren X, Gu R, and Che Y (2019) Implementation of the “sponge city” development plan in China: An evaluation of public willingness to pay for the life-cycle maintenance of its facilities. Cities 93:13–30
Farhoudi J and GhorbanianKerdabadi M (2025) Presenting effective mechanisms for water users’ participation in agricultural water management. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research 56(1):207–228 (In Persian)
Fasihi Harandi M (2019) An appraisal of Iran’s water shortage adaptation act. Journal of Iran-Water Resources Research 14(4):257-262 (In Persian)
Fife ST and Gossner JD (2024) Deductive qualitative analysis: Evaluating, expanding, and refining theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 23
Furber A, Medema W, Adamowski JF, Clamen M, and Vijay M (2016) Conflict management in participatory approaches to water management: A case study of Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River regulation. Water 8:280
Garces-Restrepo C, Vermillion DL, Munoz G, and FAO (2007) Irrigation management transfer: Worldwide efforts and results. Rome: FAO, 19p
Garraud P (2004) Agenda/emergence, dictionnaire de spolitiques publiques. Presses de la fondation nationale des sciences politiques, 49-56p
GhorbanianKerdabadi M, Liaghat A, and Malmir M (2020) Investigating and analysis the causes of failure of participatory water management policies in Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Policy 6(3):169-190 (In Persian)
Hall PA (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25:275-296
Ham C and Hill MJ (1993) The policy process in the modern capitalist state. Wheatsheaf Books
Hering J and Ingold K (2012) Water resources management: What should be integrated? Science (New York, N.Y.) 336:1234–1235
Hirschman AO (1981) Essays in trespassing: Economics to politics and beyond. Cambridge University Press, 142-166p
Hoghughi Esfahani M (2013) The water resources utilization system in Iran’s agriculture. Samar and Iranian Society of Consulting Engineers, 397p (In Persian)
Hooghe L and Gary M (2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multilevel governance. American Political Science Review 97(02)
Hope K and Chikulo B (2000) Decentralization, the new public management, and the changing role of the public sector in Africa. Public Management 2:25–42
Howard C (2005) The policy cycle: A model of post-Machiavellian policy making? Australian Journal of Public Administration 64:3–13
Howlett M and Ramesh M (2003) Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press, 13p
Howlett M and Rayner J (2007) Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘New governance arrangements. Policy and Society 26(4):1–18
Howlett M, Ramesh M, and Perl A (2009) Studying public policy, policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press, Toronto
Iranian Water Policy Research Institute (2015) Preliminary assessment of water governance in Iran. 102p (In Persian)
Islamic Parliament Research Center of The Islamic Republic of Iran (2017) Performance review of the ministry of energy in the 11th government. 12p (In Persian)
Islamic Parliament Research Center of The Islamic Republic of Iran (2021) Performance review of government (Part 5). Agricultural and Natural Resources Sector, 36p (In Persian)
JafariLangroudi MJ (2023) Legal terminology. Ganj Danesh (In Persian)
Konrad K, Truffer B, and Voß JP (2008) Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potentials: Evidence from German utility sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(11):1190–1202
Koura A, Boudhar A, and Oudgou M (2024) Navigating complexity: Unveiling the concept of policy coherence. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Organizational Studies 1:19(2)
Kumar S and Chahal VP (2018) Doubling farmers' income: Possible way out. Indian Farming 68(01):95-96
Lasswell H (1956) The decision processes. Seven categories of functional analysis, University of Maryland Press, College Park, 3-15p
Lipsky M (2010) Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation
Loughlin M (1996) Understanding central-local government relations. Public Policy Adm 11:48–65
Makris M (2003) The theory of incentives: The principal-agent model. The Economic Journal 113:394-395
Megie A (2004) Implementation, dictionary of public policies. Press of the National Foundation of Political Sciences, 283-289p
Miller G (2005) The political evolution of PA models. Annual Review of Political Science 8(1):203–225
Mousavi M and Mohammadzadeh S (2019) Empowering farmers to transition subsistence to market-oriented agriculture. Journal of Studies in Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Agriculture Development 6(3):1-22 (In Persian)
Namdar P and ParvareshRizi A (2021) Analysis of the privatization of irrigation projects in view point of legislation and policy. Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research 22(82):65-88 (In Persian)
Neef A (2008) Lost in translation: The participatory imperative and local water governance in North Thailand and Southwest Germany. Water Alternatives 1(1)
Newiga J, Jager NW, Challies E, and Kochskamper E (2023) Does stakeholder participation improve environmental governance? Evidence from a meta-analysis of 305 case studies. Global Environmental Change 82:102705
Norris E and McCrae J (2013) Policy that Sticks: Preparing to govern for lasting change. Institute for Government
Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Participative and stakeholder-based policy design, evaluation and modeling processes. Integrated Assessment 3(1):3-14
Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tàbara JD, and Taillieu T (2007) Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society 12(2)
Resnick D, Babu S, Haggblade S, Hendriks S, and Mather D (2015) Conceptualizing drivers of policy change in agriculture, nutrition, and food security: The Kaleidoscope Model. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Rostamabadi E and jalali S (2014) Water resources management in the new legal order. Amirkabir University Press, 214p (In Persian)
Savard JF and Banville R (2012) Policy cycles. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Public Administration, 1-3p
Schaub S, Vogeler C and Metz F (2022) Designing policy mixes for the sustainable management of water resources. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 24(5):463–471
Schütze N, Thiel A, and Villamayor-Tomas S (2022) Coordination across the policy cycle: Uncovering the political economy of river basin management in Spain. Environmental Science & Policy 135:182–190
Sigalla O, Tumbo M, and Joseph J (2021) Multi-Stakeholder platform in water resources management: A critical analysis of stakeholders’ participation for sustainable water resources. Sustainability 13:9260
Tabatabaei M (2008) Administrative law. Samt (In Persian)
Treasury HMS (2007) The magenta book: Guidance notes for policy evaluation and analysis. HM Treasury Magenta Book Background Papers, 1-9p
VanAst JA and Boot SP (2003) Participation in European water policy. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 28(12):555–562
Villa Alvarez DP, Auricchio V, and Mortati M (2022) Mapping design activities and methods of public sector innovation units through the policy cycle model. Policy Sciences 55(1):89–136
Weaver K (2010) But will it work? Implementation analysis to improve government performance. Issues on Governance Studies 32:1-17
Zhang Y and Wildemuth BM (2009) Qualitative analysis of content. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science, Libraries Unlimited, 319-323p

  • Receive Date 24 July 2025
  • Revise Date 20 October 2025
  • Accept Date 22 October 2025