تحقیقات منابع آب ایران

تحقیقات منابع آب ایران

توسعه‌ شاخص ترکیبی به منظور ارزیابی وضعیّت زیرساخت‌های آبرسانی و فاضلاب شهری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد اقتصاد کشاورزی، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
2 استادیار، گروه مهندسی آب، فاضلاب و محیط زیست، دانشکده مهندسی عمران، آب و محیطزیست، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
در جهان امروز که بیش از نیمی از جمعیّت آن در شهرها سکونت دارند و فعالیّت‌های اقتصادی تا حد زیادی متمرکز بر شهرها است، برخورداری از سطح مطلوبی از زیرساخت‌های آبرسانی و فاضلاب شهری پیش‌نیاز رشد و توسعه‌ی اقتصادی و اجتماعی و جلوگیری از وقوع بسیاری از بیماری‌ها و مشکلات بهداشتی بحساب می‌آید. علی‌رغم این موضوع تابحال وضعیّت زیرساخت‌های آبرسانی و فاضلاب شهری در ایران مورد ارزیابی جامعی قرار نگرفته و این خلاء باعث شده است تا هم اکنون شناخت دقیقی از وضعیّت این زیرساخت‌ها و جوانب آن‌ها‌ در نواحی مختلف ایران وجود نداشته باشد. در همین راستا در این مطالعه ابتدا با استفاده از یک تعمیم غیرپارامتریک از روش تحلیل پوششی داده اقدام به ساخت شاخص ترکیبی به منظور ارزیابی وضعیّت زیرساخت‌های آبرسانی و فاضلاب شهری برای تمامی استان‌های ایران در بازه‌ 1390 الی 1400 شده است و سپس با استفاده از الگوی اثرات تصادفی عوامل مؤثر بر وضعیّت زیرساخت‌های مذکور مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است‌. بر اساس نتایج، استان‌های مرکزی ایران نظیر اصفهان، یزد و سمنان اغلب از وضعیّت مطلوبی از حیث زیرساخت‌های مذکور برخوردار هستند و در عوض برخی استان‌های نسبتاً محروم نظیر گلستان و سیستان و بلوچستان در کنار برخی از مراکز اقتصادی و جمعیّتی نظیر خوزستان، بوشهر و فارس از جمله استان‌هایی هستند که وضعیّت نازلی از حیث زیرساخت‌های مذکور دارند. مطابق با نتایج الگوی اثرات تصادفی دو عامل شهرنشینی و عملکرد بودجه عمرانی مهم‌ترین محرّک‌های ارتقاء زیرساخت‌های آبرسانی و فاضلاب شهری هستند؛ در حالی که تراکم جمعیّت شهری اصلی‌ترین عامل در تنزل وضعیّت زیرساخت‌های مذکور بحساب می‌آید.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Developing a Composite Index to Evaluate the State of Urban Water Supply and Sewage Infrastructures

نویسندگان English

Soorena Naderi 1
Ali Moridi 2
1 M.Sc. Graduate of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics & Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, ShahidBeheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

In today's world, where more than half of the population reside in cities and economic activities are largely concentrated in urban areas, having access to a desirable level of urban water supply and sewage infrastructures is essential for the socioeconomic growth and preventing many diseases and health problems. The condition of urban water supply and sewage infrastructure in Iran has not been comprehensively evaluated so far, and this gap has led to a lack of accurate knowledge of the status of these infrastructures and their different aspects in various regions of Iran. In this study, a non-parametric modification of data envelopment analysis was used to construct a composite index for evaluating the status of urban water and sewage infrastructure for all provinces of Iran between 2011 to 2021 and the factors affecting this tatus were evaluated by using random effects models. Based on the results of this study, central provinces of Iran like Isfahan, Yazd, and Semnan mostly have a favorable situation regarding the mentioned infrastructure. Some relatively deprived provinces such as Golestan and Sistan-Baluchestan along with some economic and population centers namely Khuzestan, Bushehr, and Fars are among the provinces that have a lower status. According to the result of the random effects model, the two factors of urbanization and the actual public expenditures are the most important drivers of improving urban water supply and sewage infrastructures, while urban population density is the main factor in deterioration of this infrastructure status.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Water Supply
Sewage
Composite Index
Benefit of Doubt
Sustainable Development Goals
Allan J V, Kenway SJ, and Head BW (2021) Urban water security priorities- an Australian industry perspective. Water Supply. IWA Publishing 21(2):710–722
Alzyood M, Jackson D, Aveyard H, and Brooke J (2020) COVID‐19 reinforces the importance of handwashing. Journal of Clinical Nursing 29(15–16):2760–2761
Asghari F, Piadeh F, Egyir D, Yousefi H, Rizzuto JP, Campos LC, and Behzadian K (2023) Resilience assessment in Urban water infrastructure: A critical review of approaches, strategies and applications. Sustainability 15(14):11151
Baltagi BH (2021) Econometric analysis of panel data. Cham: Springer International Publishing
Benito B, Faura Ú, Guillamón M-D and Ríos A-M (2019) The efficiency of public services in small municipalities: The case of drinking water supply. Cities 93:95–103
Cameron AC and Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Chapagain SK, Mohan G, Rimba AB, Payus C, Sudarma IM, and Fukushi K (2022) Analyzing the relationship between water pollution and economic activity for a more effective pollution control policy in Bali Province, Indonesia. Sustainable Environment Research 32(1):5
Charnes A, Cooper WW, and Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, North-Holland 2(6):429–444
Chaysiri R, Chinviriyasit W and Louis GE (2024) Optimal control strategies for water, sanitation, and hygiene in mitigating spread of waterborne diseases. Journal of Process Control 133:103132
Cherchye L, Moesen W, Rogge N, and Puyenbroeck T Van (2007) An introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ composite indicators. Social Indicators Research 82(1):111–145
Daraio C and Simar L (2007) Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis. Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis, New York: Springer
D’Inverno G and De Witte K (2020) Service level provision in municipalities: A flexible directional distance composite indicator. European Journal of Operational Research 286(3):1129–1141
Ferreira DC, Graziele I, Marques RC, and Gonçalves J (2021) Investment in drinking water and sanitation infrastructure and its impact on waterborne diseases dissemination: The Brazilian case. Science of The Total Environment 779:146279
Frauendorfer R and Liemberger R (2010) The issues and challenges of reducing non-revenue water. Mandaluyong, Philippines: Asian Development Bank
Freudenberg M (2003) Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment. Paris
Fusco E (2015) Enhancing non-compensatory composite indicators: A directional proposal. European Journal of Operational Research, North-Holland 242(2):620–630
Greco S, Ishizaka A, Tasiou M, and Torrisi G (2019) On the Methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Social Indicators Research 141(1):61–94
Grigg NS (2019) Global water infrastructure: state of the art review. International Journal of Water Resources Development 35(2):181–205
Grimaldi M, Sebillo M, Vitiello G, and Pellecchia V (2020) Planning and managing the integrated water system: A spatial decision support system to analyze the infrastructure performances. Sustainability 12(16):6432
Hamidifar H, Ghorbani MK, Bakhshandeh MA, and Gholami S (2023) A multi-criteria multidimensional model for optimal selection of rural water supply systems. AQUA-Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society 72(6):1042–1056
Jensen O and Khalis A (2020) Urban water systems: Development of micro-level indicators to support integrated policy. PLOS ONE 15(2): e0228295
Karimi Alavijeh N, Falahi MA, Ahmadi Shadmehri MT, Salehnia N, Larsen MAD, and Drews M (2021) Perspectives of current and future urban water security in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production 321:129004
Khan S, Guan Y, Khan F, and Khan Z (2020) A comprehensive index for measuring water security in an urbanizing world: The case of Pakistan’s Capital. Water 12(1):166
McDonald RI, Douglas I, Revenga C, Hale R, Grimm N, Grönwall J, and Fekete B (2011) Global urban growth and the geography of water availability, quality, and delivery. Ambio, Springer 40(5):437–446
McDonald RI, Weber K, Padowski J, Flörke M, Schneider C, Green PA, Gleeson T, Eckman S, Lehner B, Balk D, … Montgomery M (2014) Water on an urban planet: Urbanization and the reach of urban water infrastructure. Global Environmental Change 27:96-105
Mohan G, Chapagain SK, Fukushi K, Papong S, Sudarma IM, Rimba AB, and Osawa T (2021) An extended Input–Output framework for evaluating industrial sectors and provincial-level water consumption in Indonesia. Water Resources and Industry 25:100141
Montgomery M, Stren R, Cohen B, and Reed HE (2003) Cities transformed: Demographic change and its implications in the developing world. Washington, DC: National Academies Press
OECD (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD Publishing
OECD (2015) Fostering investment in infrastructure: Lessons learned from OECD investment policy reviews. Paris: OECD Publications
OECD (2016) Water governance in cities. Paris: OECD Publishing
Opricovic S and Djordjevic B (1997) MCDM in water resources investment planning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 510–518
Pokhrel SR, Chhipi-Shrestha G, Mian HR, Hewage K, and Sadiq R (2023) Integrated performance assessment of urban water systems: Identification and prioritization of one water approach indicators. Sustainable Production and Consumption, Elsevier 36:62–74
Prüss-Ustün A, Wolf J, Bartram J, Clasen T, Cumming O, Freeman MC, Gordon B, Hunter PR, Medlicott K, and Johnston R (2019) Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene for selected adverse health outcomes: An updated analysis with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 222(5):765–777
Ray SC (2004) Data envelopment analysis: Theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Data Envelopment Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Rimba AB and Hirabayashi Y (2023) Interlinkages of water-related SDG indicators globally and in low-income countries. Water 15(4):613
Rogge N, De Jaeger S, and Lavigne C (2017) Waste performance of NUTS 2-regions in the EU: A conditional directional distance benefit-of-the-doubt model. Ecological Economics 139:19–32
Salehi S, Jalili Ghazizadeh M, and Tabesh M (2018) A comprehensive criteria-based multi-attribute decision-making model for rehabilitation of water distribution systems. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 14(6):743–765
Shephard RW (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press
Sun M and Kato T (2021) Spatial-temporal analysis of urban water resource vulnerability in China. Ecological Indicators 133:1470–160.
Tripathi S (2017) Relationship between infrastructure and population agglomeration in Urban India: An Empirical Assessment. Tokyo.
United Nations (2018) Sustainable development goal 6: Synthesis report on water and sanitation. New York, US
Vidoli F, Fusco E, and Mazziotta C (2015) Non-compensability in composite indicators: A robust directional frontier method. Social Indicators Research 122(3):635–652
Vilarinho H, D’Inverno G, Nóvoa H, and Camanho AS (2023) The measurement of asset management performance of water companies. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 87:101545
WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme) (2015) The United Nations world water development report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World. Paris: UNESCO, 122p
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 22 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 08 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 06 فروردین 1403