تحقیقات منابع آب ایران

تحقیقات منابع آب ایران

شناسایی کنشگران کلیدی و توزیع قدرت نهادی در سیاست‌های توسعه دریامحور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استاد، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.
2 دکتری، دانشکده مدیریت راهبردی، دانشگاه عالی دفاع ملی، تهران، ایران.
3 استادیار پژوهشی، مؤسسه کسب و کار اجتماعی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
تحقق توسعه پایدار دریامحور نیازمند سازوکارهای حکمرانی مؤثر و شبکه‌ای از نهادهای همکار است که بتوانند با توزیع مناسب قدرت و تعامل سازنده، سیاست‌های کارآمدی را شکل دهند. این پژوهش باهدف تحلیل ساختار نهادی حکمرانی توسعه دریامحور در ایران انجام‌شده است. تمرکز اصلی بر شناسایی الگوهای توزیع قدرت، نقش‌آفرینی کنشگران کلیدی و نحوه تعامل میان نهادهای اصلی در فرآیند سیاست‌گذاری است. روش تحقیق مبتنی بر تحلیل محتوای سند «برنامه جامع تحقق سیاست‌های کلی توسعه دریامحور» و تحلیل شبکه نهادی با استفاده از روش تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی (SNA) است. تعاملات رسمی میان ۲۸ نهاد کلیدی استخراج و در قالب ماتریس باینری کدگذاری شد. تحلیل کمی با نرم‌افزار UCINET و محاسبه شاخص‌های مرکزیت (درجه‌ای، بینابینی، بردار ویژه و مجاورت) و تجسم شبکه با نرم‌افزار Gephi انجام گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که بخش خصوصی، با بیشترین میزان مرکزیت خروجی، ورودی، بردار ویژه و مجاورت، جایگاهی راهبردی و چندبعدی در ساختار حکمرانی دارد و در تصمیم‌سازی و انتقال اطلاعات نقشی کلیدی ایفا می‌کند. در مقابل، نهادهایی همچون صندوق نوآوری و شکوفایی، وزارت دادگستری و مؤسسات پژوهشی در حاشیه شبکه قرار گرفته‌اند. این الگوی نابرابر توزیع قدرت، انسجام نهادی را تضعیف کرده و آسیب‌پذیری در هماهنگی‌های بین سازمانی را افزایش داده است؛ بنابراین، بازطراحی معماری حکمرانی و ارتقای جایگاه نهادهای کم‌اثر، ضرورتی جدی برای بهبود کارآمدی سیاست‌های توسعه دریامحور در ایران محسوب می‌شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Identification of Key Actors and the Distribution of Institutional Power in Marine-oriented Development Policies

نویسندگان English

Mehdi Ghorbani 1
Shahram Irani 2
Alireza Mohammadi 3
1 Professor, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2 Ph.D., Faculty of Strategic Management, Supreme National Defense University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Research Assistant Professor, Social Business Institute, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Achieving sustainable marine development requires effective governance mechanisms and a collaborative network of institutions capable of shaping efficient policies through the balanced distribution of power and constructive interactions. This study aims to analyze the institutional structure of marine development governance in Iran. The main focus is on identifying patterns of power distribution, the role of key actors, and the nature of interactions among major institutions in the policymaking process. The research methodology is based on a content analysis of the "Comprehensive Program for the Implementation of Marine Development Policies" and a network analysis using the Social Network Analysis (SNA) method. Formal interactions among 28 key institutions were extracted and coded into a binary matrix. Quantitative analysis was conducted using UCINET software by calculating centrality measures (degree, betweenness, eigenvector, and closeness), and network visualization was performed using Gephi software. The findings indicate that the private sector, with the highest levels of out-degree, in-degree, eigenvector, and closeness centralities, occupies a strategic and multifaceted position in the governance structure, playing a pivotal role in decision-making and information transfer. In contrast, institutions such as the Innovation and Prosperity Fund, the Judiciary, and research institutes remain peripheral within the network. This unequal distribution of power undermines institutional cohesion and increases vulnerabilities in inter-organizational coordination. Therefore, redesigning the governance architecture and strengthening the roles of underperforming institutions emerge as critical needs for enhancing the effectiveness of marine development policies in Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Decentralization
Key Actors
Marine Developement
Marine Governance
Social Network Analysis (SNA)
Abbasi Rostami A A, Yazdanpanah M, Abdashahi A, Azizi Khalkheili T, & Savari M (2022) Analysis of the social network of the governance of the integrated management of agricultural water resources in Mazandaran province. Journal of Watershed Management Research 13(25):197-209 (In Persian)
Abdollahi M, & Rezvani-Far M M (2012) Iran's legal system and the issue of environmental policy-making. Rahbord Journal 21(64):221-248 (In Persian)
Agostini L, Nosella A, & Teshome M B (2019) Inter-organizational relationships: Toward a reconceptualization of constructs. Baltic Journal of Management 14(3):346-369
Apgar M, Fournie G, Haesler B, Higdon G L, Kenny L, Oppel A, ... & Hossain M (2023) Revealing the relational mechanisms of research for development through social network analysis. The European Journal of Development Research 35(2):323
Ashtari H, Ghorbani M, Khorasani M A, & Ghafari S (2024) Dynamic analysis of organizational cohesion in the implementation of the development and advancement rural plan (case study: Gachsaran county). Journal of Rural Research 15(2):382-397 (In Persian)
Bernardino S, Santos J F, & da Silva P M (2024) Nurturing inter-organizational relationships to increase economic and social performance. Cooperativismo E Economía Social 45:21-53
Bellanger M, Speir C, Blanchar F, Brooks K, Butler J R, Crosson S, ... & Young J C (2020) Addressing marine and coastal governance conflicts at the interface of multiple sectors and jurisdictions. Frontiers in Marine Science 7, 544440
Bibin M, Vitner Y, & Imran Z (2018) Analysis of stakeholder in the development of Labombo Beach sustainable town in Palopo City analisis pemangku kepentingan dalam pengembangan wisata bahari Pantai Labombo secara berkelanjutan di Kota Palopo. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik 31(1):62-71
Bodin Ö, Sandström A, & Crona B (2017) Collaborative networks for effective ecosystem‐based management: A set of working hypotheses. Policy Studies Journal 45(2):289-314
Bodin Ö, & Prell C (Eds.) (2011) Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press
Bodin Ö, & Crona B I (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change 19(3):366-374
Borgatti S P, Mehra A, Brass D J, & Labianca G (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916):892-895
Dahou T, & Chalfin B (2019) Governing Africa’s seas in the neoliberal era. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
Diviák T (2020) Criminal networks: actors, mechanisms, and structures. [Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen]. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Eftekhari H, & Allahyari M S (2015) Identifying the Organizational intelligence of agriculture-jihad organization in Guilan Province, Iran
Einloo F, Ekhtesasi M R, Ghorbani M, Abdinejad P, & Anjomshoaa R (2022) Network analysis of organizational stakeholders for participatory management of water resources (Case study: Abhar Plain). Journal of Range and Watershed Management 75(2):263-282 (In Persian)
Ernstson H, Barthel S, Andersson E, & Borgström S T (2010) Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: the case of Stockholm. Ecology and Society 15(4)
Garakani S A, Ghorbani M, Ghafari S, Avazpour L. & Amiri S (2024) Evaluating land governance with emphasis on dynamics of organizational relationships (Case study: Gachsaran County). Natural Resources Governance 1(2):181-197 (In Persian)
Ghafari S, Ghorbani M, Salajegheh A, Fritsch O, Naderi A, & Gain A K (2024) Tracing water governance across different levels in Iran. Environmental Science & Policy 162:103933
Gofen A, Moseley A, Thomann E, & Kent Weaver R (2021) Behavioural governance in the policy process: introduction to the special issue. Journal of European Public Policy 28(5):633-657
Guerrero A M, McALLISTER R R, Corcoran J, & Wilson K A (2013) Scale mismatches, conservation planning, and the value of social‐network analyses. Conservation Biology 27(1):35-44
Howlett M, Ramesh M, & Perl A (1995) Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (Vol. 163). Toronto: Oxford University Press
Helbling J, & Anderson J (2016) Social network analysis for assessing research team collaboration and implementation capacity. In 2016 Resilience Week (RWS) (pp. 172-177), IEEE
Kobayashi M (2023) Promoting sustainable fisheries and aquaculture–enabling policies, innovation and challenges for achieving sustainable blue economies in Ambon, Maluku Province, Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1207(1):012006, IOP Publishing
Motalebi Karbakandi A, & Zare Zardini M (2022) Strategies for developing a marine-based economy to achieve the goals of a resilient economy. Quarterly Journal of Defense Economics and Sustainable Development 6(22):53-81 (In Persian)
Matovu B, Mahmoud F, Mwabvu B, Muyomba A, & Nalubega S (2024) Global ocean governance and policy: are current trends in research and collaboration networks invigorating toward sustainable ocean futures? KMI International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries 16(2):77-122
Mills M, Álvarez-Romero J G, Vance-Borland K, Cohen P, Pressey R L, Guerrero A M, & Ernstson H (2014) Linking regional planning and local action: Towards using social network analysis in systematic conservation planning. Biological Conservation 169:6-13
Mutalib M A, Saleh N S S N, & Ali N M (2021) Child care or child scare: enhancing the legal requirements on health and safety in child care centres laws and regulations in Malaysia. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication 6(24):177-185
Rahman M M (2022) Effectiveness of the coastal and marine conservation initiatives in Bangladesh: analyzing the drawbacks of the legal, policy, and institutional framework. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 18(2):149-172 (In Persian)
Ramezani S & Rahimi M (2024) Air Pollution Governance System: Application of organizational network analysis of clean air law enforcement. Journal of Natural Resources Governance 1(1):39-49
Samadi Foroushani M, Keyhanpour M J, & Musavi-jahromi S H (2022) Analysis of Iran's water governance structure based on water-food-energy NEXUS: an application of the social network analysis (SNA). Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage 16(3):563-579 (In Persian)
Satumantpan S, & Chuenpagdee R (2022) Interactive governance for the sustainability of marine and coastal resources in Thailand. Environment and Natural Resources Journal 20(6):543-552
Sun C, Yang Z, & Yang Y (2024) Navigating the tides of change: The local dynamics of China’s marine economic policy. Marine Policy 165:106207
Yatim M H M, Omar A H, Abdullah N M, & Sarip A (2018) Extending the concept of institutional analysis to the marine spatial planning practice. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 169(1):012010, IOP Publishing
Zhang W, Zhang M, Yuan L, & Fan F (2023) Social network analysis and public policy: what’s new? Journal of Asian Public Policy 16(2):115-145
Zulfiqar K, & Butt MJ (2021) Preserving community’s environmental interests in a meta-ocean governance framework towards sustainable development goal 14: A mechanism of promoting coordination between institutions responsible for curbing marine pollution. Sustainability 13(17):9983
دوره 21، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 75
,ویژه نامه اصلاح ساختار حکمرانی آب کشور
پاییز 1404
صفحه 27-42

  • تاریخ دریافت 08 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 15 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 25 خرداد 1404